Dr.
Isailovic serves as an expert witness in patent litigation:
he assesses and evaluates patents and patent portfolios.
Patent
Assessment
Our staff can help you maximize the value of your patent portfolio
by evaluating it to assess whether it might infringe on existing
or emerging technology standards. We also evaluate portfolios
to rate patent claims for licensing potential. We produce
claim charts including limited reverse engineering when necessary.
Conversely, we can help you minimize the cost of bringing
your technology to market by assessing whether identified,
existing patents infringe on your technology.
In the case of alleged patent infringement, we examine the
prior art to try and determine its validity.
KEYWORD SUMMARY: Digital cinema, channel
coding/modulation; intellectual property; A/V, video architect,
video distribution, VoD, streaming video, video compression,
MPEG-1-2-4-7-21, AVC/H.264, VC-1, JPEG, DTV, HDTV, standards
committee, set-top box design, video monitors; multimedia;
analog and digital circuits and systems design; optical recording,
DVD.
Electronic laboratory notebooks
A patent provides rights to an inventor to restrict the ability
of others to make, use or sell an invention. To obtain a patent,
an inventor must submit a novel and unique concept to a government
agency. In the scientific domains, laboratory notebooks are
typically used as the primary evidence toe prove inventorship
of a concept and the details of its first successful use,
or what is known as “reduction to practice”. The
US awards patents on a “first inventor” basis
rather than on a “first to file”, as almost rest
of world does.
Lately, the use of electronic laboratory notebook (ELN) technology
has risen sharply. ELN technology has not only led to increases
in laboratory efficiency and improved leverage of institutional
knowledge, but also to enhance protection of intellectual
property (IP). In December 2006, the risk of ignoring the
proper management of patent-supporting electronic records
changed appreciably with amendments to the United States Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP). These changes alter the procedures
of discovery, which is the process of requesting, or compelling,
information from one party to another in a civil case [see
Rule 26(a)(1) A and B].
|